Talk:Aviendha
From A Wheel of Time Wiki
| Wikipedia has an article about this subject at Aviendha. This page aims to provide supplemental material not suitable for a general encyclopedia such as detailed plot analysis, summaries, or fandom.
This page uses content from that article; the list of authors can be seen in that page's history. |
[edit] First or Second
I thought Aviendha was Rand's First Lover, Min his second, and Elayne his third. Min's page supports this view but the last edit to Aviendha states she was second. Can we get a book/chapter reference on Min going first? (and it wasn't when he got the never healing wound in his side) Rand thinks he has to marry Aviendha, this attitude doesn't make sense if she isn't his first, and Elayne later says something to the effect of "Min and Avienda have both had something from you I want, and I want it now" so Elayne didn't go first either... --Melriken 23:42, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Rand and Aviendha first make love in TFoH Ch. 31 Rand and Min first make love in ACoS Ch 19. Thus, Aviendha was first. Fatidiot1234 04:35, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
Sort of on the subject, we had a wise, guy from the University of Rochester, NY stop by earlier this month. Yes, I was just bored enough to look that up. --Gherald 04:49, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- It's not clear why you removed the encyclopedia link. Your comment doesn't seem to make any sense, but so be it. Fatidiot1234 05:00, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- As can be seen from my revision, which changes the date on your signature, what happened is you added the link (revising your comment) while I was in the process of posting mine, which was for amusement purposes only : ) --Gherald 20:06, 28 February 2008 (UTC)Fatidiot1234 20:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
You haven't explained why you deleted http://www.encyclopaedia-wot.org/ Fatidiot1234 20:42, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
- Uhm. What I said is: "you added the link (revising your comment) while I was in the process of posting mine"
- Put another way, when I clicked edit there was no link. I did not notice you revised your comment in the interim. --Gherald 06:33, 1 March 2008 (UTC)
